- Success Criterion 1.2.2
- Conformance level A
- W3C reference F74
Video-as-Text-Alternative Never Labeled or Captioned
1.2.2 — Captions (Prerecorded)
Scenario
Setting
A project-management tool's task board
What’s wrong
A video that is meant as an alternative to on-page text isn't labeled as such, so it also isn't captioned and users don't know the text version exists.
Example
Here's a real case from a project-management tool's task board: a video that is meant as an alternative to on-page text isn't labeled as such, so it also isn't captioned and users don't know the text version exists.
Why it matters
Deaf and hard-of-hearing viewers, and anyone watching video without sound. On a project-management tool's task board, this barrier means they are left guessing what the media actually shows.
How to test
Find any video positioned as an alternative to page text: confirm it's labeled as such and check whether it's also captioned as required.
How to fix
Label the media clearly as an alternative to the adjacent text version.
Outcome
Corrected, a project-management tool's task board now lets a visitor understand the image, video, or audio content.
Who is affected
Deaf and hard-of-hearing viewers, and anyone watching video without sound.
Learn more
- Understanding Understanding document (opens in a new tab)
- Technique Related technique (opens in a new tab)
Related scenarios
- Captions That Skip Dialogue or Important Sound Effects
- Video With Extra Content the Captions Never Include
- Prerecorded Video Published With No Captions Whatsoever
- YouTube Auto-Captions Never Corrected for Accuracy
- Captions That Drift Out of Sync With the Audio
- Burned-In Captions Too Small or Low-Contrast to Read