- Success Criterion 2.5.8
- Conformance level AA
Table Row Action Icons Too Small and Too Close Together
2.5.8 — Target Size (Minimum)
Scenario
Setting
A calendar app's event-creation form
What’s wrong
Table row action icons (edit/delete) small and adjacent.
Example
.guest-row .edit-icon, .guest-row .delete-icon { width: 16px; height: 16px; margin: 0 3px; } Why it matters
Someone removing a guest from the invite list taps edit instead of delete, since the two icons sit almost touching.
How to test
Measure adjacent row-action icons (edit/delete) in a table: small size plus tight adjacency without the spacing exception fails.
How to fix
Give destructive icons like delete extra spacing, since a mistap there is harder to undo.
.guest-row .edit-icon, .guest-row .delete-icon { width: 24px; height: 24px; margin: 0 6px; } Outcome
A user removes the correct guest without accidentally opening the edit dialog.
Who is affected
People with reduced dexterity and users of adapted pointing devices with less precise control.
Learn more
- Understanding Understanding document (opens in a new tab)
Related scenarios
- Tap Target Smaller Than the Required 24×24 Pixel Minimum
- Small Icon Buttons Packed Too Close Together to Tap
- Pagination Numbers Packed Too Tightly Below 24 Pixels
- Tiny Carousel Dots Clustered With No Spacing Between Them
- Calendar Day Cells Too Small to Tap in Compact View
- Toolbar Icons Packed Edge to Edge With No Gap