case study

WCAG 2.2 AA Audits: 15+ Finance Sites, 6 Proven Wins

WCAG 2.2 AA Audits: 15+ Finance Sites, 6 Proven Wins

get in touch

Know where you stand. Know what to work on next.

Tell us what you’re working on and where you need support. Our accessibility specialists can help with audits, remediation, VPAT/ACR, accessible development, and ongoing compliance.

Free 30-minute consultation (opens in new tab)

Free 30-minute call: talk through where you stand, scope a project or get a quote.

Need technical answers now? Book the $100 one-hour consultation to walk through an audit, talk with a developer or review your site live.

Let’s find the barriers before your users do

Indicates a required field.


Your information is kept private and never shared with third parties.

Client & Context

A WCAG 2.2 AA audit is repeatable; trust at scale is not. Between December 2025 and April 2026, EnhanceAccess Private Limited engaged HalfAccessible six separate times to audit and remediate websites for their financial-sector clients — and rated every single engagement 5.0.

The portfolio spanned more than fifteen brands, including Auxano, Turtle Wealth, Erito Ventures, Indorient, LongArc, Trifecta Capital, Airavat Capital, Aionios Alpha, Mavenark, Alkemi Capital, Elev8, Xeed Ventures, Kitven, Kae Capital, Dhyana Capital, and Pixelsky Capital.

The Challenge

Financial and venture capital websites share a familiar set of accessibility risks: data-heavy layouts, PDF fact sheets, animated counters, and third-party form embeds. Each WCAG 2.2 AA audit had to produce findings a different development team could act on without hand-holding — and the work had to stay consistent across fifteen different codebases and CMSes.

Running a WCAG 2.2 AA Audit at Portfolio Scale

We standardised the methodology once and applied it relentlessly: automated scanning to catch the obvious, then manual testing with NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver, and keyboard-only navigation for everything automation misses — focus order, trap states, announcement quality, and reflow. Automated tools help with coverage, but W3C WAI notes that evaluation tools cannot check every accessibility aspect. Every finding was mapped to its WCAG 2.2 success criterion (see the full WCAG 2.2 Recommendation) with severity, location, and a concrete fix. Where US federal procurement baselines matter alongside WCAG, we also keep Section508.gov guidance in view.

For Airavat and Aionios Alpha we went beyond reporting and performed the remediation ourselves — fixing semantics, ARIA usage, contrast, and keyboard support at code level, then re-testing against the original findings.

The Results

  • 15+ financial-sector websites audited against WCAG 2.2 AA
  • Two platforms fully remediated at code level and re-verified
  • One consistent reporting format adopted across every engagement
  • Six consecutive contracts, every one rated 5.0 out of 5.0

Repeat engagements are the metric we care about most: an agency that returns six times in five months is not buying reports, it is buying reliability.

Why Financial Websites Face Higher Accessibility Risk

Financial services websites face meaningful digital accessibility exposure under ADA Title III — ADA.gov web guidance sets out how the ADA applies to websites — and the exposure is growing: the European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) now applies to consumer financial services sold into the EU (see also the European Commission’s EAA overview), and investors increasingly screen portfolio companies for compliance risk before funding rounds. For venture firms, an inaccessible website is not just a legal liability — it contradicts the diligence story they sell.

The technical patterns repeat across the sector. Animated AUM counters that screen readers read as noise. Portfolio grids built as clickable divs with no keyboard path. Fact sheets published as untagged PDFs. Contact forms from third-party CRMs with unlabelled fields. A WCAG 2.2 AA audit that understands these patterns finds in hours what generic audits find in days — which is why we also publish a dedicated finance and banking accessibility specialty.

The Issues We Found Most Often Across 15+ Sites

  • Insufficient text contrast on brand-coloured stats, links, and chart labels
  • Missing or duplicated accessible names on navigation and social icons
  • Carousel and counter animations with no pause mechanism (WCAG 2.2.2)
  • Focus order breaking on mobile menus and modal newsletter prompts
  • Heading structures that skip levels, making screen reader scanning impossible

Because every report used the same format and severity model, EnhanceAccess could move developer teams between projects without retraining them on how to read the findings — the quiet efficiency that turns one engagement into six. When fact sheets and disclosures are in scope, those files can move through our PDF document remediation track after the web audit.

Planning Your Own Audit Programme?

If you manage multiple properties and need a repeatable WCAG 2.2 AA audit partner, start with our accessibility audit services, review accessibility audit pricing, or book a consultation about a portfolio arrangement. Sector context lives on our finance and banking accessibility specialty; the full catalogue is on our services.

Prefer proof from neighbouring programmes? See our ADA website remediation case study and white label accessibility audits case study — those led with remediation and agency delivery; this programme led with portfolio-scale WCAG 2.2 AA audits for financial websites.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does a WCAG 2.2 AA audit take for a marketing site?

Most financial marketing sites in this programme were audited in one to two weeks, depending on template count and the volume of PDFs and interactive components in scope. Book a consultation to confirm a timeline for your stack, or review public packages on accessibility audit pricing.

Do you audit the PDFs too?

Yes — fact sheets, decks, and disclosures are tested for tagging, reading order, and form accessibility, and can be remediated to PDF/UA as an add-on through our PDF document remediation service.

Can one report serve multiple development vendors?

That was the point of the standardised format: the same severity model and fix-guidance style worked across every codebase in the portfolio. Criteria map to WCAG 2.2 so vendor teams share one baseline.

What do WCAG 2.2 AA audits for financial websites include?

Manual testing with real assistive technology (including NVDA), automated coverage scanning, severity-mapped findings with locations and concrete fixes, and a consistent report format teams can act on without hand-holding. The service SKU is under accessibility audit services; finance-sector patterns are covered on our finance and banking accessibility specialty. Authority baselines: WCAG 2.2, ADA.gov web guidance, and Section508.gov.

How much does a portfolio WCAG 2.2 AA audit programme cost?

Public package ranges are on accessibility audit pricing; multi-site portfolio work is scoped after a short discovery call so template reuse and PDF volume are priced honestly. Start with book a consultation or browse our services.

Start free assessment

Send your URL for a free preliminary check. We reply within one business day.