- Success Criterion 1.1.1
- Conformance level A
Figure Caption That Doesn’t Describe Its Own Image
1.1.1 — Non-text Content
Scenario
Setting
A public library's catalog search
What’s wrong
Figure/figcaption misuse where the caption doesn't describe the image and no alt exists.
Example
A public library's catalog search shows the problem clearly: figure/figcaption misuse where the caption doesn't describe the image and no alt exists.
Why it matters
Blind and low-vision people using screen readers, and anyone who browses with images disabled, when icons or photos carry meaning. On a public library's catalog search, this barrier means they are left guessing what the media actually shows.
How to test
Compare the figcaption text to the image's own alt attribute: figcaption should add commentary, not substitute for a missing alt — check the image separately still has one.
How to fix
Give the image alt text; use figcaption for commentary, not as a substitute for alt.
Outcome
Corrected, a public library's catalog search now lets a visitor understand the image, video, or audio content.
Who is affected
Blind and low-vision people using screen readers, and anyone who browses with images disabled, when icons or photos carry meaning.
Learn more
- Understanding Understanding document (opens in a new tab)
Related scenarios
- Product Photo Added as a CSS Background With No Alt Text
- Chart Alt Text That Never Explains What Each Color Means
- Outdated Alt Text That No Longer Matches the Image
- Alt Text Left as a Filename Instead of a Real Description
- Decorative Image Not Hidden From Screen Reader Users
- Decorative Image Given Alt Text Instead of Being Marked Silent