- Success Criterion 1.2.1
- Conformance level A
Video Alternative Not Labeled as a Substitute for Article Text
1.2.1 — Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)
Scenario
Setting
A crowdfunding platform's campaign page
What’s wrong
Media alternative for text not labeled as such, when relying on that exception.
Example
Watch a crowdfunding platform's campaign page closely and you'll spot this: media alternative for text not labeled as such, when relying on that exception.
Why it matters
Deaf people who need transcripts of audio-only media, and blind people who need alternatives to silent video. In this case (a crowdfunding platform's campaign page), they miss information that's only conveyed visually.
How to test
Find any media marked as an alternative to on-page text: confirm it is explicitly labeled as such (e.g., 'audio version of this article') — unlabeled fails.
How to fix
A complete, accurate transcript (or an equivalent audio track for video-only media) must be provided and linked right next to the media.
Outcome
Once corrected, a crowdfunding platform's campaign page lets them hear or read what the media conveys.
Who is affected
Deaf people who need transcripts of audio-only media, and blind people who need alternatives to silent video.
Learn more
- Understanding Understanding document (opens in a new tab)
Related scenarios
- Audio Description File Left as a Filename, Not Real Text
- Long Description That Doesn’t Match What the Audio Actually Says
- Podcast Episode Published With No Transcript at All
- Transcript Missing Speaker Names or Key Background Sounds
- Auto-Generated Transcript Too Inaccurate to Trust
- Silent Demo Video With No Transcript or Narration