Ontario Businesses Are Already Bound By AODA
The Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act requires most organizations operating in Ontario to meet WCAG 2.0 AA — this is a current obligation, not a future deadline.
HalfAccessible delivers Canada website accessibility audits for organizations covered by the Accessible Canada Act, Ontario AODA, and the newer provincial accessibility acts. Every audit combines automated scanning with manual testing by CPWA-, CPACC-, and WAS-certified specialists, benchmarked against WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 Level AA.
Canada regulates digital accessibility at both the federal and provincial level. The Accessible Canada Act (ACA) covers federally regulated organizations, including Parliament, Crown corporations, banking, telecommunications, and transportation, and 2025 amendments set web accessibility deadlines of December 5, 2027 for the public sector and December 5, 2028 for the private sector, tested against CAN/ASC EN 301 549, which incorporates WCAG 2.1. Ontario's Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) already requires most public and private organizations in the province to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA, with similar laws now active in Manitoba and Nova Scotia. An accessibility audit benchmarked against WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA covers the technical requirements of the ACA, AODA, and the newer provincial acts in a single engagement. Primary sources: the Accessible Canada Act, SOR/2025-255 digital amendments, Ontario's AODA, and WCAG 2.2.
Think of this audit like a legal and technical health check for your website or product. Instead of guessing whether you meet local accessibility law, we test against the exact standard that law references and show you precisely where you stand.
Meeting the right legal standard protects your organization from enforcement risk and makes your product usable by more people.
The Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act requires most organizations operating in Ontario to meet WCAG 2.0 AA — this is a current obligation, not a future deadline.
2025 amendments to the Accessible Canada Act set December 5, 2027 for federal public-sector web accessibility, and December 5, 2028 for federally regulated private-sector organizations, referencing a standard built on WCAG 2.1.
Banking, telecommunications, and transportation companies fall under federal jurisdiction and carry some of the earliest, most specific obligations under the ACA.
Administrative monetary penalties under the ACA can range from roughly $250 to $75,000 per violation, scaled to severity.
We audit public websites, authenticated applications, SaaS platforms, mobile apps, documents, and design systems.
Corporate websites, marketing sites, government websites, university websites, healthcare websites, ecommerce journeys, landing pages, blogs, resource libraries, and multilingual content experiences.
Customer portals, admin dashboards, CRMs, internal software, enterprise workflows, complex forms, authenticated user journeys, data tables, reports, notifications, and role-based interfaces.
B2B platforms, cloud software, analytics dashboards, AI applications, product onboarding flows, account settings, billing workflows, and feature-rich application screens.
Native iOS, native Android, hybrid applications, progressive web apps, orientation changes, touch targets, gestures, screen reader flows, zoom behavior, and mobile form interactions.
PDFs, Word documents, PowerPoint files, forms, reports, policy documents, financial statements, healthcare documents, education resources, and procurement documentation.
Reusable components, UI libraries, pattern libraries, design tokens, Figma components, interaction patterns, and documentation that affects many pages or product screens.
Marketing, ecommerce, healthcare, government, education, nonprofit, and service organizations use accessibility audits to make essential public content available to more people.
Product teams use audits to validate complex workflows, reduce accessibility debt, improve component libraries, and prepare for enterprise accessibility reviews.
Legal, compliance, procurement, and sales teams use audit evidence to answer buyer questions, support VPAT work, and document remediation commitments.
Evaluate public websites against WCAG 2.2 AA using manual testing, automated scanning, keyboard-only navigation, and assistive technologies.
Review authenticated user journeys, dashboards, complex forms, data tables, notifications, custom widgets, and enterprise workflows.
Test native and hybrid applications using VoiceOver, TalkBack, keyboard alternatives, zoom, orientation changes, touch target review, and gesture accessibility checks.
Assess PDFs and office documents for tagging, reading order, alternative text, bookmarks, form fields, headings, tables, and screen reader compatibility.
Identify accessibility issues in Figma files, design systems, and component specs before development begins, reducing rework and improving handoff quality.
Evaluate products and prepare accessibility documentation that supports enterprise and government procurement conversations.
Each issue is mapped to user impact, the relevant standard, severity, affected users, and practical remediation guidance.
Missing or inaccurate alternative text prevents screen reader users from understanding meaningful images, icons, charts, infographics, product photos, and linked graphics. We identify images that need concise alternatives, images that should be marked decorative, and complex visuals that need longer explanations.
Many users navigate with a keyboard, switch device, voice control, or assistive technology that relies on keyboard behavior. We test focus order, skip links, menus, modals, tabs, accordions, custom widgets, and form flows without a mouse.
Low contrast can make text, buttons, icons, form controls, and charts difficult or impossible to perceive. We evaluate contrast for normal text, large text, UI components, focus indicators, disabled states, links, and error messages.
Forms often block users when labels, instructions, required indicators, validation messages, and error handling are not accessible. We test forms with keyboard navigation and screen readers to confirm users can complete and submit successfully.
Headings, lists, landmarks, tables, and reading order help assistive technology users understand a page quickly. We identify skipped heading levels, missing landmarks, and reading-order mismatches.
Modern applications often update content without refreshing the page. We test status messages, ARIA live regions, notifications, and single-page app transitions to confirm important changes are announced correctly.
| Feature | Automated Testing | Manual Testing |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Fast (minutes) | Slower (days) |
| Cost | Low | Higher, but more accurate |
| Manual WCAG Review | No | Yes |
| Keyboard Navigation | Limited | Complete |
| Screen Reader Compatibility | No | Yes |
| Logical Reading Order | No | Yes |
| Meaningful Alternative Text | No | Yes |
| Form Usability | Partial | Yes |
| Overall User Experience | No | Yes |
A structured process gives your team clear findings, clear priorities, and a practical path to compliance.
We review your platform, page count, workflows, and target standard (WCAG 2.0 AA for AODA, or WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA for the Accessible Canada Act) to define audit scope and timeline.
We run automated tools across the defined scope to catch code-level issues quickly, giving us a baseline before manual review begins.
Certified specialists manually test keyboard navigation, focus order, forms, headings, and interactive components against WCAG success criteria.
We test with screen readers (NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver, TalkBack), voice control, and switch access to confirm real-world usability, not just code compliance.
Findings are documented with severity, standard references, screenshots, and reproduction steps, then organized into a prioritized remediation roadmap.
After your team implements fixes, we retest affected pages or flows to confirm issues are resolved and no new barriers were introduced.
Covers federally regulated organizations, including banking, telecommunications, and transportation. 2025 amendments set web accessibility deadlines of December 5, 2027 (federal public sector) and December 5, 2028 (federally regulated private sector) against CAN/ASC EN 301 549. See the Accessible Canada Act and the Canada Gazette amendments (SOR/2025-255).
Ontario's Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act requires most public and private organizations in the province with 50 or more employees to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA today, with staff accessibility training also required. Practical guidance: How to make websites accessible.
Manitoba's Accessibility for Manitobans Act and Nova Scotia's Accessibility Act apply similar digital accessibility expectations in those provinces. See Manitoba Accessibility and Nova Scotia Accessibility.
National Standard of Canada for ICT accessibility adopted by Accessibility Standards Canada and incorporated into the Accessible Canada Regulations digital amendments. Aligns with EN 301 549 and includes WCAG 2.1 web criteria. Overview: Accessibility Standards Canada; penalty schedule: Accessible Canada Regulations Schedule 2.
A clear summary of audit scope, key risks, priority themes, and recommended next steps for stakeholders.
A practical status snapshot that helps teams understand current accessibility maturity and remediation priorities.
Issue-by-issue findings with screenshots, affected URLs or screens, severity ratings, standard references, and reproduction steps.
Practical remediation guidance, code-level notes, component recommendations, and examples your developers can act on.
Findings organized to support accessibility statements, VPAT and ACR documentation, and procurement or legal review.
Validation evidence after remediation, showing which issues were fixed and what remains open.
HalfAccessible brings CPWA, CPACC, and WAS accessibility expertise to audits, remediation support, documentation, and product guidance.
Reports are written for action. Developers receive clear reproduction steps, expected behavior, affected users, standard mapping, and remediation guidance.
We support businesses operating across multiple regulatory regions with a single audit benchmarked to the highest applicable standard.
Audit scope is tailored to your product and priorities so your team receives useful findings without unnecessary reporting overhead.
Whether you are a federally regulated organization tracking the Accessible Canada Act deadlines or an Ontario business meeting AODA today, our certified specialists will identify every real accessibility barrier and hand your team a prioritized, developer-ready roadmap. Quick audits start at $500, complete audits at $2,000.
Request an Accessibility Auditget in touch
Tell us what you’re working on and where you need support. Our accessibility specialists can help with audits, remediation, VPAT/ACR, accessible development, and ongoing compliance.
Indicates a required field.
Your information is kept private and never shared with third parties.
Answers to common questions about Canada Website Accessibility Audit Services (AODA & ACA).
AODA applies to public and private organizations operating in Ontario. Most organizations with 50 or more employees must meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA on their websites and provide staff accessibility training. See the AODA statute and Ontario’s website accessibility guidance.
Under the 2025 amendments, federally regulated public-sector organizations must meet web accessibility requirements by December 5, 2027, and private-sector federally regulated organizations by December 5, 2028, against CAN/ASC EN 301 549. See the Canada Gazette SOR/2025-255 and the Accessible Canada Act.
Possibly. Federally regulated organizations fall under the Accessible Canada Act regardless of province. Organizations operating in Ontario, Manitoba, or Nova Scotia may also need to meet that province’s own accessibility act.
Accessible Canada Act administrative monetary penalties are set out in the Accessible Canada Regulations Schedule 2 and can range from $250 to $75,000 for many minor digital violations (higher for serious/very serious classifications). AODA also carries its own Ontario penalty structure.
HalfAccessible offers a $500 Quick Accessibility Audit for smaller sites and a $2,000 Complete Audit for full-site or application coverage, plus custom enterprise pricing for larger platforms. See our pricing page for details.